How to Stress-Test Your CPG Financial Model Before the Crisis Finds You
Most CPG founders build financial models for the best case. Jeff Church explains how to stress-test for the real case—and what happens when you don't.
It was 5:00 p.m. on July 3, 2018.
My family was already home getting ready for the Fourth. Scott Uzzell from Coca-Cola's VEB group called. He told me Coke wasn't going to acquire the rest of Suja.
I hung up. Walked downstairs. And wept in front of my sons.
Here's the part most people don't know about that moment. We weren't just disappointed about a deal falling through. We were staring down $40 million in secured debt due in October. We had weeks on the calendar where we had less than $100,000 in the bank. We'd been growing 20% per year for three straight years after Coke's minority investment. We were on every "most promising brand" list in the country.
And somehow we hadn't built a real plan for what would happen if our biggest strategic partner walked away.
That's the thing nobody talks about when they tell the Suja story. The growth was real. The validation was real. But somewhere in the race, we built our financial model around a bull case that had quietly become the only case.
Here's what I've learned from 44 fundraising rounds spread across eight companies: most CPG founders build financial models. Almost none of them stress-test those models.
The bull case becomes the plan. The base case feels like the floor. The bear case doesn't get a slide. Maybe you throw in a line about "headwinds" in the appendix and call it conservative.
That's not scenario planning. That's wishful thinking with spreadsheet formatting.
The founders who survive real crises almost always saw them coming. Not because they're clairvoyant. Because they had forced themselves to sit down, on an unremarkable Tuesday when nothing was on fire, and think through what "bad" looks like.
"The decision that saves you is almost never the one you made on the day you needed saving. It's usually one you made eighteen months earlier, on a Tuesday, when nobody was watching."
That's one of the most important sentences I know. The wellness shots that eventually saved Suja weren't launched after Coke passed. They were launched eighteen months before. Because someone asked the question: what if our highest-margin product category fails and we need to replace the revenue?
Ask that question first. Build the model second.
Three Scenarios, Not One
When I review a financial model now, the first thing I look for is the bear case. Most founders send me one tab. Maybe two.
A real financial model has three scenarios built in. Side by side. Linked to the same assumptions.
Bull case: Revenue comes in at 110 to 120 percent of plan. Your distributor expansion hits, your hero SKU has a breakout quarter, the retailer reset goes your way.
Base case: 90 to 100 percent of plan. Things work mostly as expected. A few delays, a few small wins. Roughly what you believe is realistic.
Bear case: 60 to 75 percent of plan. Two retailers push you out of their reset. A co-man price increase compresses your margin. Your Series A takes six months longer than expected. This is the scenario you don't want to look at... and exactly why you have to.
The bear case isn't pessimism. It's engineering. A bridge that's only designed for a sunny day isn't a bridge.
When a sophisticated investor or acquirer reviews your model, the bear case is the one they weight most heavily. They've seen enough of these companies to know the bull case rarely shows up on schedule. What they want to see is that you've thought clearly about the downside and that your business survives it.
If it doesn't survive it... that's information you need before they do.
Apply the Rule of Twos to Your Cash Projections
I've said this a thousand times and I'll say it again. Everything in CPG takes twice as long and costs twice as much as you expect.
Your launch is planned for Q1? Build the model for Q3. The retailer who gave you a verbal is "definitely coming through"? Assume six months of delays. The fundraising round you're projecting to close in sixty days? Model ninety. Then model one-twenty.
This is the Rule of Twos applied to cash planning specifically. If your model shows six months of runway, your real runway is probably three. If you're planning to launch in spring, build the cash schedule for fall.
This isn't defeatism. It's the difference between a founder who panics when things slow down and one who responds calmly because they planned for it.
The math is simple. Run your monthly burn rate against your bear case revenue. Figure out the month you run out of money. Now back up four months from that date. That's when you need to have started your next raise.
Not when you're out of money. Four months before you run out of money.
Know Your Alert Thresholds Before You Need Them
One of the most practical things I did at Suja was build what I called an "alert dashboard" into our financial model. Not a color-coded executive presentation thing. A simple set of triggers that told us when to shift from normal operations into different modes.
Green: Eighteen or more months of runway remaining. Operate normally. Invest in growth.
Yellow: Twelve to eighteen months of runway. Tighten discretionary spending. Begin informal conversations with existing investors. Update your fundraising deck.
Orange: Nine to twelve months of runway. Start formal fundraising now. No exceptions. The founders who wait until they're at six months are fundraising from desperation, and investors can smell it a mile away. "Enthusiasm attracts. Desperation repels."
Red: Six months or less. Fundraise in emergency mode and simultaneously start identifying cuts. What's the minimum viable version of this company? What do you have to protect and what can you let go?
Most founders I work with have never written down these thresholds. They operate on vibes. They keep telling themselves "we'll start talking to investors next quarter." And then one day they're at $100,000 in the bank with a $40 million debt due in October.
Build the dashboard now. When you're calm, when you're not in crisis. Write down exactly what you will do at each stage. Then follow the plan when the moment comes.
The Four Sensitivities That Matter Most
When I stress-test a CPG model, I run four specific sensitivities. You should do this quarterly.
1. COGS sensitivity. What happens to gross margin if your ingredient costs go up 10 percent? If your co-man raises rates by 15 percent? Most founders can't answer this without pulling up a spreadsheet. You should know this number cold. "Gross margin determines destiny," and in CPG your destiny can shift with a single supplier conversation.
2. Revenue concentration. What if your largest retailer cuts your orders by 30 percent? What percentage of your revenue disappears if one customer goes away? If the answer makes you nauseous, that's a signal, not just a risk.
3. Velocity shortfall. What if velocity at your new retail accounts comes in at 50 percent of projections? Velocity is the most commonly overestimated number in CPG financial models. New doors don't fill overnight. Distribution gains are not velocity gains. Don't confuse the two.
4. Fundraising delay. What if your next round takes six months longer than planned? What do you cut, in what order? Write this down now. When you're in the middle of a difficult fundraise is the worst time to be making those decisions for the first time.
The Three Questions for Every Board Meeting
Before every quarterly board meeting, I want founders to be able to answer three questions without hesitating.
First: if revenue comes in 30 percent below plan this quarter, what do we cut and in what order?
Second: if we need to bridge for 90 days while we close the next round, what's the story we're telling investors and why should they believe it?
Third: what do we need to do to reach cash flow neutral without a next round?
That third question is the one most founders never seriously ask. They assume the next round is coming. "Hope is not a strategy." Know what it takes to get to self-sustaining, and know how far you are from it at all times.
The night after the Coca-Cola call, sitting with my family as fireworks went off outside, I wasn't thinking about growth rates or valuation multiples. I was thinking about the investors who'd trusted us, the employees who'd poured everything into building Suja, and how much of what happened was avoidable.
Some of it wasn't avoidable. Markets shift, partners change their minds, deals fall through.
But the financial fragility we found ourselves in that July... that was preventable. We had been running toward a single outcome. We hadn't seriously modeled the day the outcome didn't arrive.
The turnaround happened. Two years later, Suja was sold to Paine Schwartz for approximately $300 million. But it happened because people made hard, disciplined decisions under pressure, decisions they had to figure out on the fly under the worst possible conditions.
Dream boldly. Plan soberly.
The stress test you build on a quiet Tuesday is the thing that makes sure you're still standing when the hard Tuesday finds you.
If you want to build a more resilient CPG financial model, the MBA for CPG program walks through scenario planning frameworks, cash management benchmarks, and the financial disciplines that separate brands that survive from brands that don't. And if you're in the middle of a cash crunch right now, the 90-Day Breakthrough is designed to help you stabilize, prioritize, and find the path forward.
Want more insights like this?
Get Jeff’s take on what’s actually working in CPG. Direct to your inbox.