← Back to Blog
·9 min read·Jeff Church

Celebrity Equity Deals in CPG: What Every Founder Needs to Know Before You Sign

Before you hand a celebrity equity in your CPG brand, read this. Jeff Church breaks down when these partnerships work, when they backfire, and how to structure them.

Celebrity Equity Deals in CPG: What Every Founder Needs to Know Before You Sign

Back in 2018, I was sitting across from a founder who was practically glowing. Big smile. Eyes lit up. He slid a single sheet of paper across the table at me.

"We've got a celebrity interested," he said. "Once they're in, this thing takes off."

I looked at the sheet. A recognizable name. Decent following. The kind of person who'd get you a second look from a buyer or an investor who might otherwise pass.

I asked two questions.

First: Does this person actually use your product? Second: What are you giving up to get them?

He shifted in his seat. "They're open to trying it... and we're thinking around eight percent equity."

There it was. The two warning signs I've seen kill celebrity deals before they ever deliver. Someone who doesn't authentically use the product, and a founder giving away equity before they've proven that the partnership will actually move the needle.

I'm not anti-celebrity deal. Far from it. Ryan Reynolds sold Aviation American Gin to Diageo for $610 million in 2020. Dwayne Johnson turned a marketing arrangement with ZOA Energy into headline-grabbing momentum. Jay-Z's Armand de Brignac was acquired by LVMH for a reported $640 million. These deals are real, they're massive, and they've changed what's possible in CPG.

But for every Aviation Gin, there are thirty celebrity-adjacent brands sitting in the markdown bin. Founders who gave up equity, diluted their cap table, generated a short spike in social media buzz, and watched the velocity numbers stay flat.

There's a right way to do this. And most founders are doing it the wrong way.

The Three Types of Celebrity Partnerships

Not all celebrity deals are the same, and most founders don't realize that until it's too late to renegotiate.

Promotional partnerships are the simplest. The celebrity posts about your product, appears in your ads, shows up at events. You pay them in cash, product, or some mix of both. No equity. This is endorsement, plain and simple. Lowest risk, lowest upside. Good for a trial bump. Won't build a brand.

Licensing deals go a step further. The celebrity licenses their name, image, or likeness to your brand or product. You pay royalties, typically somewhere between 5% and 15% of net revenue. The celebrity earns ongoing income. You get the association. Still no equity if you structure it right. The risk here is brand dependency... if that celebrity falls from public grace, your brand is attached.

Equity deals are the big ones. The celebrity takes an ownership stake. They're financially aligned with the long-term success of the business. In theory, this means they're invested, motivated, and constantly promoting. In practice, what it means is you now have a co-owner who may or may not show up, may or may not honor commitments, and definitely has their own team of lawyers who will want control provisions you hadn't thought about.

The one Jeff's rule about all three: start with the smallest commitment possible, prove the value, then scale up. Don't hand someone 8% equity on the hope that their audience follows.

The Alignment Test (The One Thing Most Founders Skip)

I've seen this movie enough times to know where it goes.

Founder finds celebrity. Celebrity's manager says they're "interested." Founder, understandably excited, starts designing co-branded packaging before anyone has even agreed to terms. Six months later, the celebrity has never once mentioned the brand on their own channels. The product launch falls flat. Founder is out six figures in legal fees and product development... and down equity.

The question you have to ask before anything else is this: Would this person use my product even if there were no deal?

At Suja, we were lucky. The cold-pressed juice category was already being embraced by athletes, celebrities, wellness influencers. People were genuinely consuming the product. When a celebrity showed up in our world, it wasn't because we hunted them... it was because they'd found us. That authenticity is irreplaceable.

You can market your way into trial, but you cannot market your way into loyalty. The same principle applies to celebrity partnerships. If the celebrity isn't genuinely enthusiastic about what you've built, their audience will sense it. And an insincere endorsement is worse than none.

Before you offer equity or sign anything, require three things:

  1. They use the product for sixty days with no deal in place.
  2. They post organically at least twice without being asked or paid.
  3. You have direct conversations with them, not just their manager.

If they won't do those things, the relationship will not work. End of discussion.

The Cap Table Problem Nobody Talks About

Here's the math I wish more founders understood before they started handing out equity.

You're building toward an exit. Let's say you sell for $50 million... a solid outcome for most CPG founders. At that point, every percentage point of equity is worth $500,000. If you gave a celebrity 8% to "open doors," you just handed them $4 million. If the doors never opened? You paid $4 million for a press release and some Instagram posts.

I've been involved in 44 fundraising rounds across my career. The single most underestimated cost early founders pay is the equity they scatter in the early stages to advisors, celebrities, influencers, brokers, and friends who "know people." It adds up fast. By the time institutional investors show up, you're looking at a cap table that's a mess... and the valuation that covers your dilution may never come.

My general rule: no equity for a celebrity partnership until they've proven they can move product. Here's what "proven" means. Track baseline velocity in whatever stores you're in. Run the partnership. If velocity in those stores improves measurably over ninety days, that's signal. Then you have a conversation about a longer-term, equity-based relationship.

Equity without performance milestones is charity, not strategy. Never do it.

Structure the Deal to Protect Yourself

If you've passed the alignment test and the performance data is real, here's how to structure a deal that doesn't come back to haunt you.

Vesting is non-negotiable. No celebrity should receive equity that fully vests on day one. A standard structure is four-year vesting with a one-year cliff. If they're gone after year one for any reason... injury, scandal, shift in focus... they leave with 25% or less. You protect yourself.

Performance milestones over fixed equity. Instead of "we're giving you 5% of the company," structure it as: "You earn up to 5% of the company, vesting over four years, contingent on X posts per quarter, X appearances, and X minimum velocity improvement in the designated markets." This aligns incentives. They get paid when they perform.

Limit control provisions. Some celebrities... or more accurately, their lawyers... will try to insert approval rights over packaging, marketing copy, product formulation, even hiring. Hard pass. You need operational flexibility, especially in the early stages of building. A minority equity partner should not have veto rights over your business. Full stop.

Define the social media commitment clearly. "Regular posting" means nothing legally. Define it: six original posts per quarter minimum on Instagram and TikTok, no less than one video per month, and at least two appearances at brand events per year. Get it in writing.

Build in a right of first refusal. If the celebrity wants to exit their equity position, you want the right to buy them out before they can sell to a third party. The last thing you need is to discover that a celebrity's stake ended up in the hands of someone who has no relationship with your brand.

When Celebrity Partnerships Actually Work

I want to be fair here. I've seen these deals change companies.

The common thread in the success stories isn't the celebrity's follower count. It's not their cultural cachet. It's operational intensity. The brands that win are the ones where the celebrity is genuinely in the weeds... on calls with the sales team, doing appearances at retail resets, pushing the product at every opportunity because they believe in it.

Aviation Gin worked because Ryan Reynolds was in it for real. The creative was genuinely funny. The brand had a point of view. And Reynolds kept the content machine running long after the launch bump faded.

The deals that fail are the ones where the celebrity shows up for the announcement and disappears. Where the "partnership" is really just a licensing arrangement with equity stapled on top. Where the founder got so excited about the name recognition that they forgot to build the brand.

Here's the honest truth: a celebrity partner cannot save a mediocre product. The shelf is the truth-teller. If consumers pick it up once and don't come back, no amount of Instagram posts will fix that. What celebrity partnerships do is accelerate what's already working. They compress the timeline to awareness. They open doors at retail buyers who might otherwise take another year to give you a meeting.

But acceleration and foundation are two different things. Build the foundation first.

What I'd Tell a Founder Today

If you have a celebrity genuinely interested in your brand... lucky you. That's a real asset. Here's how I'd approach it:

Start with a promotional deal. Cash or product, ninety-day term. See if they show up. Measure the impact. If velocity moves and the celebrity is genuinely enthusiastic, you have something real. Now have the equity conversation.

Keep equity below 5% unless you're bringing in someone who is truly co-building the brand with you... strategy, distribution relationships, the whole thing. Most celebrity "partnerships" are worth promotional money, not equity.

Hire an attorney who has done celebrity equity deals before, not just a general startup lawyer. The IP provisions, the morality clauses, the brand-damage protections... these are specific, and getting them wrong is expensive.

And keep your eyes on the fundamentals. Gross margin determines destiny. Not the celebrity. Not the press coverage. Not the Instagram follower count. The pennies in your unit economics matter more than who's posting about you.

"Revenue without margin is ego" applies here too. A celebrity deal that drives volume at the cost of your unit economics is not a win. It's a slow leak.

Dream boldly. Plan soberly.


Want to build a CPG brand that's ready for strategic partnerships and institutional investors? The MBA for CPG gives you the full operating playbook. Or if you're ready to accelerate right now, the 90-Day Breakthrough is where we put the strategy into action.

brand strategycelebrity partnershipsfundraisingequitybrand building

Want more insights like this?

Get Jeff’s take on what’s actually working in CPG. Direct to your inbox.